Two days ago it looked like that the BJP leadership in Bihar had
amicably settled seat sharing negotiations with three of its allies –
Ram Vilas Paswan of LJP, Upendra Kushwaha of RLSP and Jitan Ram
Manjhi of HAM – but it is now proving to be a bit of a bumpy ride.
The
alliance partners are now fighting over who would get what seats. This
process is getting murkier as it is mired with ego clashes of the
leaders who are constantly probing at other's share rather than looking
at their own kitty. Also, both Paswan and Kushwaha are excessively keen,
as sources suggested, that the BJP should distribute seats to their
candidates in their areas, parliamentary constituencies represented by
their party leaders, after consulting them.
LJP and RLSP
chiefs have reservation over the names of a few candidates which BJP or
HAM may field but the BJP does not find the condition
acceptable. Upendra Kushwaha has fielded his spokesman Fajal Imam Mallik
to give some lessons on coalition dharma to the BJP.
On Tuesday,
Chirag Paswan of LJP expressed “surprise” and “shock” over the manner in
which seat sharing arrangement was announced by the BJP chief Amit Shah
– the announcement of seats were not exactly in consonance with the
understanding they earlier had. BJP has for long, since the time Atal
Bihari Vajpayee assumed power in 1997, credited itself for successfully
formulating a coalition dharma and following it for six years at the
Centre and in the states while being in Opposition.
Paswan
is done sulking after several rounds of talks with Amit Shah, Ananth
Kumar and Dharmendra Pradhan and giving vent to his feelings.
Kushwaha, on the other hand, is still sulking. His spokesman Mallik
says, “The BJP has not adhered to coalition dharma. The fact that we are
the alliance partners for Bihar elections means that the BJP needs us
as much as we need the BJP. Now, we have landed in a situation when even
as the talks on identification of seats for alliance partners is going
on they (BJP) have declared a number of seats for the first and second
phase of elections. That’s not fair in a coalition.”
Today
Kushwaha’s party MP Arun Kumar had talks with BJP election-in-charge for
Bihar, Union Minister Ananth Kumar. But the issue has not yet been
fully resolved. An RLSP leader said, “We have decided not to engage with
Bihar BJP leaders. Whatever further negotiations have to happen between
us and the BJP will have to take place with BJP’s central leadership
only.”
The BJP on its part has decided not to walk extra mile to
make a conciliatory remark. “We have been very fair in seat sharing
talks and have tried to accommodate all of their concerns. We have
addressed to all such issues. That’s it. Now is the time to move on and
campaign vigorously and all concerned should understand that.”
The
problem, as sources from both sides suggested, was the announcement of
few seats in Kushwaha’s parliamentary constituency Karakat, including
Nokha assembly seat to its leader Rameshwar Chaurasia. A RLSP leader
said, “Our opposition is not to Chaurasia but the BJP, who has fielded
some turncoats from JD(U) and other parties, in areas of our influence
without bothering to consult us.
Interestingly, in the outgoing
assembly none of the BJP’s partners had an MLA who was elected on same
party’s ticket. The BJP had won 92 seats out of 101 seats it had
contested in alliance with JD(U) in 2010 assembly elections. Paswan’s
LJP had won three seats but soon after the elections they all joined
Nitish Kumar’s bandwagon.
Upendra Kushwaha and Jitan Ram Manjhi
were both part of JD(U). Kushwaha formed his Rashtriya Lok Samata Party
in 2013 and Manjhi formed his Hindustani Awam Morcha in 2014. Manjhi,
however, had managed to engineer split in the JD(U) when he was forced
to exit from the post of chief minister and used certain legal
provisions to ensure 15 MLAs on his side don’t face disqualification.
NDA partners are proving to be the biggest aspirational class in Bihar.
No comments:
Post a Comment